blog.lancehaun.com

My ramblings

Hair

Filed under: Me — Lance at 7:20 pm on Tuesday, April 29, 2008

For the past ten years, I have essentially had one hairstyle: finger length on top, various levels of lengths on the side. I haven’t had it over an inch long since before this. Maybe it was longer whenever we were dirt poor and my wife was cutting my hair but not by much.

Anyway, it is to the point where I would normally cut it and I am thinking of letting it grow out and doing something different. Here are my limitations:

  • My hair is very blond
  • My hair is thicker on the sides than on top

So what do you think may look good when I get it grown out long enough?

And yeah, this is the first time I’ve thought about changing my hair in ten years.

More news from the NBA

Filed under: Portland, Sports — Lance at 1:01 pm on Friday, April 18, 2008

If you don’t like the NBA, just keep on moving.

NBA team owners voted overwhelmingly in favor of allowing the Seattle Supersonics to move out of Seattle and into a market that is more than a million people smaller than Seattle. It is ridiculous.

The great news is two of my favorite NBA executives were the ones who voted against the deal.

Mark Cuban, the famous owner of the Dallas Mavericks and Paul Allen, the slightly less vocal owner of the Portland Trail Blazers. That’s it, everyone else voted for the move.

Let me just say that I am happy that Allen is the owner of MY basketball team today. If the owner of your home team voted to allow a deal like this, I wonder what their intentions could be? Maybe they want the flexibility to move their team when the city or state won’t pay 500 million for a new arena (after a 74 million dollar renovation 13 years ago).

Bitter? I think not

Filed under: 2008 election, Politics — Lance at 2:26 pm on Monday, April 14, 2008

If anything has perked up my ears about Obama, it has been this quote that has been widely circulated:

“You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them…And they fell through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not,” he said.

“And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations,” he also said.

Hillary misses the mark on this issue for focusing on the “bitter” part of the remarks. I think it is hard to argue whether or not midwesterners are bitter overall. Obviously if you live in an area referred to as the “Rust Belt” though, you may be bitter. Especially when people are building businesses and creating new industries. When you consider that Oregon and California both have higher unemployment than all of the rust belt states except Michigan, I don’t know how these people could be MORE bitter than other areas. Still, whether or not people are actually bitter is really moot. I don’t care.

I also enjoyed the derision from the “Bill Clinton ushered in economic paradise” mantra that has infected Democrats for a while. Would Clinton even be mentioned if his wife weren’t running in the primary? Doubtful. But I am off topic…

What I am bothered by is this idea that because of poor economic conditions, they cling to guns, religion, racism, anti-immigrant and anti-trade ideas. That if someone were to give them a helping hand (I am assuming the government), that they would be able to rise up out of this desperate dependence on these (assumingly) bad things. Or, even assuming the best possible implication, that midwesterners would then be able to choose whether or not they actually like these things.

What I feel like he is saying is that a large number of people (at least in the midwest) who want to have guns, who believe in a god, who are racist, who are anti-immigrant/trade haven’t at all thought about their stances. That if their economic conditions improved, that they would simply come out of it.

Now I don’t know about you but I don’t know any middle or upper class people who are racist, religious, own guns or are anti-immigrant. So maybe he has a good point. Haha

Of course, it is smart of Obama supporters to play off the actual words with what he intended: using wedge issues that exploit these beliefs is wrong. And that’s popular with people who feel that Kerry was denied the presidency because of wedge issue gamesmanship. Even if I believe that Obama misspoke and that he doesn’t have a problem with people who have legitimate and differing beliefs on immigration policy, gun rights, believe in a god, or trade issues, I still get hung up on something.

Wedge issue voters, while perhaps more emotionally charged and controversial than others, are still simply single issue voters. And the problem with deriding single issue voters is that they end up being your supporters too so you come off looking like a hypocrite when you pander to issue groups.

And it is only suspicion at this point but I do believe that Obama meant exactly what he said in Frisco. He wants to help them overcome their financial difficulties so that they can see the light and embrace his viewpoints. It may be inspirational to hear for people who think religious belief or gun ownership has more to do with economic hardship than actual beliefs but for everyone else, you’ve got to be curious where that comes from.

If I may end on a cop out note, Obama’s views not withstanding, I still feel like he would be a weaker executive than Clinton would be. And when you are talking about weakness in regards to an opposing viewpoint, you prefer the weaker one because they would be less successful in implementation. So my views on Obama are still nil but I thought the quote was not a pretty thing for him.

The Top Ten Jail Blazers of All Time

Filed under: Portland, Sports, teh funny — Lance at 12:33 pm on Friday, April 4, 2008

I am feeling overwhelmed on my friends page about the new baseball season (something I could really care less about) so I figured a basketball post would be worthwhile. Specifically, a top 10 of the worst of the “jail blazer” era.

Now in case you’re not familiar, there was about an eight year stretch where my NBA team, the Portland Trail Blazers, were basically a bunch of criminals playing together. You worried if any of them were violating their probation by hanging out with other criminals. It was an embarrassment.

Recently, the Blazers have cleaned up their act (which is great) but I was reminded of this past era when I was listening to the radio on the way home from

work yesterday (1080 the fan). They put together a top five of the worst Jail Blazers. I am going to put together a top ten list of the worst Jail Blazers and why. And just as a note, this is an “all time” list so it is going to include everything (even when they weren’t with the Blazers). As if we need to demonstrate that most of these guys had issues before and after they came to the Blazers.

So without further ado:

(Read on …)